Posts Tagged: Integral Psychology
Elliott Ingersoll: Integral Psychology Essays
Below you find abstracts and excerpts from Essays and Books by Integral Psychologist and Associate Academic Director for CIW Dr. Elliott Ingersoll. You need to be logged in to download the essays and book excerpts.
Elliott Ingersoll is a licensed psychologist and clinical counselor in Ohio. He is professor of counseling/counseling psychology and “Distinguished Faculty Member” at Cleveland State University. His research interests span a broad spectrum including psychopathology, mental health diagnosis, psychopharmacology, and spirituality in counseling and psychotherapy. He has authored or co-authored six books and dozens of peer-reviewed papers and book chapters on mental health related topics.
Elliott has been inspired and influenced by the Free Thought movement of the late 19th century and particularly by Robert Green Ingersoll, a leading freethinker of that time. He believes the most important skill for a human being is critical thinking seasoned with compassion. Elliott also is a singer/songwriter and creator of “FreeThought Folk Music” which he performs throughout Northeast Ohio. His CD “American Infidel” was released in 2013.
He has worked with Ken Wilber and the Integral Psychotherapy Team at Integral Institute since 2004 developing the Integral Psychotherapy approach. Integral Psychotherapy draws upon all validated psychotherapeutic approaches to help clients deal with psychological symptoms or live more fulfilling lives by removing barriers that come from living unconsciously. As an Integral Coach, he helps clients take action through motivation, methods of inquiry, and assisting clients in using the Integral Model to achieve their goals and improve their lives.
The Self-System in Integral Counseling
R. Elliott Ingersoll and Susanne R. Cook-Greuter
The authors introduce the integral model of the self-system and, using that model, describe the dynamics of healthy growht and the development of psychogenic pathology. Self-identification is described as "sliding" in nature, and stage theories for self-related lines are outlined to help clinicians understand the characteristics of each stage the self may slide into. The authors outline K.Wilber's (2000a) metaphor of ladder, climber, and view to describe both healthy development and the development of pathology. Constructs of translation and transformation are described in the context of ladder, climber, view, and the authors conclude by summarizing clinical approaches to problems in translation.
Ingersoll, R. E. & Cook-Greuter, S. (2007). The self system in Integral counseling. Counseling & Values, 51 193-208.
Download below
An Integral Approach to Spiritual Wellness in School Counseling Settings
R. Elliott Ingersoll and Ann L. Bauer
Spirituality is a dimension of humanness and spiritual wellness is a construct that reflects spiritual health. This article describes how Wilber's (1995) Integral Model can be used to integrate spiritual wellness into school counseling settings. This includes behavioral, psychological, cultural, and social dimensions accross lines and levels of development.
Ingersoll, R. E. (2004). An integral approach to spiritual wellness in school settings. Professional School Counseling, 7, 301-308.
Download below
Spirituality, Religion, and Counseling: Dimensions and Relationships
R. Elliott Ingersoll
Although United States culture is experiencing a resurgence of interest in spirituality, little work has been advanced that specifically operationalizes definitions of spirituality or discusses the relationship between spirituality and religion. In addition, there is an absence of literature addressing how counselors may work with explicitly spiritual issues in the counseling session. This article aims to describe spirituality, discuss spirituality in relation to religion, and approach spiritual issues in the clinical setting.
Ingersoll, R. E. (1994) Spirituality, Religion, and Counseling: Dimensions and Relationships, Counseling and Values, 38, 98 - 112.
Download below
An Integral Approach for Teaching and Practicing Diagnosis
R. Elliott Ingersoll
Psychologists and other students training to be mental health professionals are required to learn how to use the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association. Needed, however, are approaches to the instruction and practice of diagnosis that incorporate the transpersonal domain as well as holistic perspective of clients. This paper describes an approach to supplement the standard 5-axis DSM diagnosis using Ken Wilber's Integral Model.
Ingersoll, R. E. (2002). An Integral Approach for Teaching and Practicing Diagnosis. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 34, 115-127.
Download below
Spirituality and Counseling: The Dance of Magic and Effort
R. Elliott Ingersoll
I tell my students and clients that life is a combination of magic and effort. If you put forth the effort, the magic usually meets you half way.
I am not claiming that there are guarantees, that life can be controlled, or even that everyone gets a fair shake. Some people seem to put forth no effort and get more magic than David Copperfield. Others seem to give 110 percent, and the magic moves slowly. I am not claiming to have some secret, esoteric insight. I am stating, based on my experience, that there is magic and there is effort. I call the combination of the two "life" and the process of tuning into the magic "spirituality." Since counselors' main job is helping clients get more deeply in touch with life, it only makes sense that they integrate spirituality into their work.
Ingersoll, R. E. (2007). Spirituality and counseling: The dance of magic and effort. In O. Morgan (Ed.). Counseling and spirituality: Views from the profession (pp. 230-247). New York: Lakasha Press.
Download below
Gentle Like the Dawn: A Dying Woman's Healing
R. Elliott Ingersoll
This article recounts the author's counseling relationship with a client who was a nursing home resident. The article describes the client's spiritual experiences and their impact on both the client and the counselor.
Ingersoll, R. E. (2000). Gentle like the dawn: A dying woman's healing. Counseling and Values, 44 129-134.
Download below
Religion, Guilt, and Mental Health
Christopher M. Faiver, Eugene M. O'Brien, and R. Elliott Ingersoll
This article reviews the constructs of religion, guilt, and mental health and explores relationships between these constructs as they pertain to the counseling profession. General therapeutic approaches are identified and summarized for counseling practice.
Faiver, C. M., O'Brien, E., & Ingersoll, R. E. (2000). Religion, guilt and mental health. Journal of Counseling & Development, 78, 155-161.
Download below
Evil and Counseling
R. Elliott Ingersoll
When I praise things god-like, I find evil in the Gods. - Philoctetes
Great human suffering exists in the world. Some of this suffering is endemic to the existential givens of the human condition (aging, disease, and death). Some is the result of complex human dynamics that lead to conflict on various levels--in our homes, in our schools, on our streets, and between our nation states. As many spiritual leaders have taught, suffering seems to be woven into the fabric of life. Many of us become counselors to ease human suffering, accepting that we will never erase suffering from the human condition. Some suffering, far from being caused by esistential givens, is clearly unnecessary and deeply malevolent.
From: Faiver, C. M., Ingersoll, R. E., O'Brien, E., & McNally, C. (2001). Explorations in Counseling and Spirituality: Philosophical, practical, and personal reflections. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole.
Download below
If you are an existing user, please login Click here.
New users may register below Click here.
Unique Self Dialogue Part 7: Ken Wilber & Marc Gafni
Conventional understandings of the shadow (the term first used in psychology by Carl Jung to describe the unconscious) leave many students of psychology befuddled or confused. Ken Wilber and Marc Gafni have charted groundbreaking perspectives on shadow which deepen our awareness of what it means to be human and how we can lives more fully conscious lives. Wilber's contribution, described in Transformations of Consciousness as well as other books, connects shadow to issues in the navigation from one fulcrum of consciousness to the next. Gafni's contribution, articulated in Your Unique Self, describes shadow as a distortion of Unique Self or an unlived part of one's unique story.
Listen to the dialogue and read a partial transcript:
If you are an existing user, please login Click here.
New users may register below Click here.
Ken Wilber: An Outline of an Integral Psychology
Abstract:
Although far from unanimous, there seems to be a general consensus that neither mind nor brain can be reduced without remeinder to the other.
This essay argues that indeed both mind and brain need to be included in a non reductionic way in any genuinely integral theory of consciousness. In order to facilitate such integration, this essay presents the results of an extensive cross-cultural literature research on the “mind” side of the equation, suggesting that the mental phenomena that need to be considered in any integral theory include developmental levels or waves of consciousness, developemental lines or streams of consciousness, states of consciousness, and the self (or self-system).
A “mastertemplate” of the sevarious phenomena, culled from over one-hundred psychological systems East and West, is presented. It is suggested that this mastertemplate represents a general summary of the “mind” side of the brain-mind integration. The essay concludes with reflections on the “hard problem,” or how the mind-side can be integrated with the brain-side to generate a more integral theory of consciousness.
This essay also ends up being a fairly comprehensive summary of my own psychological model, or an outline of an integral psychology.
Elliott Ingersoll & Marc Gafni: Unique Self – A Bridge Between Psychology and Spirituality
In these dialogues, Dr. Elliott Ingersoll, who is the Associate Academic Director or the Center for Integral Wisdom, and Dr. Marc Gafni, the Co-Founder and Director of CIW, have partnered up to explore how the Unique Self teaching can act as a bridge between Psychology and Spirituality.
In part 2, they discuss how the Unique Self teaching adds a whole dimension to the more classical psychological teachings on Shadow. Amongst others they explore how mainstream psychology reduces our authentic grandeur to grandiosity and how to let anger show us the way to our vitality.
Listen to these two dialogues with Marc Gafni and Elliott Ingersoll:
Eros & Pseudo-Eros
From Your Unique Self by Dr. Marc Gafni
Eros is both a constructive and destructive force.
She appears both as the “terrible mother” or “destroying goddess,” as well as the “nurturing mother” and “radiant lover.”
Shekhinah in Kabbalah and Kali in Hinduism are two synonyms for Eros. Shekhinah in Kabbalistic text appears as both a constructive and destructive force, and Eros always has these two faces of destroyer and mother. The constructive face reaches toward prior union. But sometimes Eros appears as tough love. This is the Eros of destruction, which is really de-construction. The destructive face tears down old structures, obsolete preconceptions, and the illusions of the separate self. This de-constructive expression has often been termed Thanatos.
There is, however, a second more terrifying form of Thanatos that is not animated by Eros. It is rather suffused with the desperation and brutality of the ego’s mad craving for eternal power and existence. This is the face of pseudo-Eros.
Let me explain.[Read more…]
Marc Gafni: Welcome to Integral Psychology

The goal of an “integral psychology” is to honor and embrace every legitimate aspect of human consciousness by embracing what is true in each of them. This portal on the Center for Integral Wisdom multi-plex presents an integrative view of consciousness, psychology, and therapy.
The rise of an Integral Psychology is one of the greatest invitations of the century. It draws on pre-modern, modern, and postmodern psychological models to find patterns which are healing, transformational, and integrated in a model that includes mind, soul, and spirit.
The psychological models also include interior and exterior distinctions, levels or structures of consciousness, typologies, and states of consciousness. Integral Psychology is the understanding that we have this great new source of wisdom in the world which emerged.
There has been a huge contribution to thought in the past couple hundred years with Freud but also with our new understanding of the human mind which says that we hold in our conscious selves what we make unconscious, including the early drivers (wounds) that shape our personality and deconstruct the vital eros within us.
Integral Psychology offers maps, each of which offer a set of healings or techniques to return the human being to fuller human existence, a more effective being and becoming.
Each of the 11 or 12 major schools of psychology has a somewhat different map of existence, of the human mind, and distinct suggestions for what the best method is for transformation. What Integral psychology seeks to do is to recognize what is true in each of these seemingly exclusive models. Specifically, it recognizes that each of them is true but partial.
Each school of psychology speaks to and addresses a different level of human existence or consciousness. All of them are healing and need to be integrated into the healing wisdom of humanity.
In trying to evolve a global ethic for a global civilization, we need to integrate them into a seamless psychological model that includes all the elements of mind, soul, and spirit. Likewise all the interior and exterior dimensions must be included.
Finding the best practices of all the schools of psychology is one of the great invitations of this century.
Homepage
Home portal content goes here
Unique Self & Psychology
The alleviation of personal suffering requires for greatest efficacy a therapy that works at the level of identity. What is the purpose of my life? How can I realize the values and direction that are uniquely my own? Unique Self is emerging as a revolutionary new technology for psychologists.
Q & A
The following is a transcript of an excerpt from a dialogue between Joe Perez and Marc Gafni in July 2012 (audio file available for download at the bottom of the page).
Joe: I’m here with Marc Gafni and this is another 10-minute dialogue on Unique Self. Our topic today is Unique Self and psychology. I understand that Unique Self may be a new chapter in thinking about self in psychology and has generated a lot of excitement. I’m hoping that you tell me more about that.
Marc: That’s fantastic, Joe. I would be delighted to. We’re working with a number of leaders in the field in addiction, eating disorders, trauma therapy, internal family systems, etc. – particularly Professor Richard Schwartz, founder of internal family systems, a member of the World Spirituality Council. We’re working together on a paper on internal family systems and Unique Self. And Lori Galperin, with her clinical co-director Mark Schwartz, who are leaders in the world who have built centers throughout the world for eating disorder, sexual addiction, trauma therapy, etc., are developing with a team of therapists at their center a full program for Unique Self therapy. Particularly, they are developing a set of Unique Self models with a team of therapists to actually use as part of the intensive therapeutic process that takes place at their treatment centers.
Let me share for a second, if this is helpful, how this came about and why it’s so absolutely critical. Classical therapy at its best, classical psychology at its best, creates equilibrium. You get some of the disturbing factors out of the way, you become aware of them, you bring them into consciousness, you create a relationship with the different parts of self, and you feel a less disturbed, more balanced – more homeostasis if you will – more integration in your core system, which is fantastic. For any of us who felt disturbance (and who hasn’t?), whether in the form of depression or any other significant psychological disorder – and I think all of us have some moment where we run into some deep sort of psychic pain – the possibility of alleviating that pain is a huge function of psychology.
The problem is that it is often not sustainable because it doesn’t answer the larger questions of: Then what? Why am I here? What’s the nature of my life? Does my life have purpose, meaning, direction? Without addressing what it means to live a purpose-driven life, or values-driven life, and how I can identify the purpose and values of my particular life, all the homeostasis and equilibrium ultimately collapses, from a Unique Self perspective, and doesn’t sustain.
What we’re saying is that Unique Self fills in a critical missing piece in the story of treatment, whether that’s chemical dependency, addiction issues, eating disorders. It invites a person to define themselves not as an addict – as the classical 12-step model suggests – but as a Unique Self who has a set of Unique Shadows which are distortions of one’s own primary Unique Self, and to reclaim that Unique Self – the dignity, purpose, meaning, the values that are implicit in that Unique Self. And we’ve found that by actually enacting one’s Unique Self and accessing a sense of being profoundly needed by the cosmos, having a unique gift to give, actually experiencing all of reality living in you and as you and through you uniquely, with a unique contribution, a unique set of abilities, a unique way of being in the world, unlike any other, one that never was, is, or will be again; that has enormous efficacy as a healing process, a healing modality, a transformative modality that creates a sustained locus in a human being that can hold the psychic pain of engaging in the world. We’ve found that without that Unique Self locus all the other psychological work, important and critical as it is, often lacks a home, a locus, a place where it can rest and be sustained.
We are now developing – and this is a multi-year process, will take at least a decade to fully offer it to the worldwide community – our goal is to develop sets of Unique Self modules, Unique Self therapeutic process (like an EMDR process, which is a trauma process) which therapists can be trained in in a year of supplemental training. Our hope is that five to seven years from now there will be 5,000 or 10,000 therapists in America actually deploying Unique Self therapy in a significant way. That’s where it’s going. We’ll be getting the first group of 10 or 20 thousand therapists to deploy this. It’s one of the key lines of development in society which Unique Self is now meeting and deploying in its own vital way.
Joe: That’s really exciting. When I think about what you just said, I wonder if you’re talking about creating a new school of psychology or if you’re talking about enhancing the schools of psychology that currently exist with something new.
Marc: That’s a great inquiry. The answer is: a little bit of both. We haven’t fully clarified it yet. It will definitely be an enhancement of existing schools of psychology; it will be a critical dimension they can all access. We don’t need to have an old fight like in the olden days. disproving the efficacy of all the schools of psychology. Actually they do have efficacy. One of the things that our friend and integral mentor Ken Wilber has pointed out brilliantly in a long essay in his book Transformations in Consciousness, is that each school of psychology at a particular fulcrum of development has important unique gifts to give. We want to honor the particular gifts of each type of psychology. There is particular type of trauma work, for example, that Unique Self doesn’t address.
I was talking recently to Besel Van der Cook, perhaps the leading trauma therapist in the world, some would say, a brilliant theoretician and researcher, and we were talking about Unique Self particularly, and we both kind of agreed after a significant conversation that when people walk into his office they first need to deal with the overwhelming psychic pain and rupture and disruption of essential personality features, period. There are methods that he and other trauma therapists have developed to do that. If you try to have a Unique Self conversation about identity at that stage, it’s a mistake. We want to receive that methodology, but then when that stage has passed, what I said to Besel is that that’s when we need to bring Unique Self to bear. That’s when issues of identity becomes critical, it becomes part of other schools of psychological work, and adds a critical component.
I think is also true as you suggest is that Unique Self needs to develop into its own school of psychology. We need people writing on this. Rob McNamara wrote an important essay posted on this website on Unique Self and transpersonal psychology. The essay that I’m writing with Professor Richard Schwartz will be completed in the next several months. And there needs to be a deepening of how to deploy Unique Self as a psychological model. Then there’s the empirical work we’re doing at the treatment centers, so I think it will be a both/and. I’m sure we’re making mistakes, but I’m sure we’re making really great mistakes in the right direction. Unique Self has the possibility like perhaps no other individual component has in the last 50 years to transform the therapeutic process and investing within it a dimension of identity and spirit which is actually post-dogmatic and post-metaphysical, which can really change the game.
File Size: unique-self-dialogue-gafni-perez-on-relationships-July2012 (18.6 MB)
Learn more about Unique Self and Psychology:
- See Your Unique Self: The Radical Path to Personal Enlightenment (Integral Publishers, 2012)
- See “What Psychologists Are Saying” on the uniqueself.com site
- See Robert McNamara’s “Transpersonal Psychology and the Integral Yoga of the Unique Self” on the uniqueself.com site
Also see our Unique Self Recovery Portal!
Teachings on Shadow
The call to integrate the shadow is a hallmark of contemporary psychology and schools of personal growth. And yet puzzles remain which are uniquely reachable through an approach which includes Unique Shadow, the unlived story. Unique Shadow is the supreme gateway to Unique Self.
Q & A
The following is a transcript of an excerpt from a dialogue between Joe Perez and Marc Gafni in July 2012 (audio file available for download at the bottom of the page).
Joe: Welcome Marc to the next Unique Self dialogue: ten minutes today on Unique Self and shadow.
Marc: What a great invitation to enter the shadows. Let’s shadow-dance to the light. Joe, it’s great to hear your voice and talk to you. Let me try to say it succinctly. It’s a huge topic that we spent two full chapters on in Your Unique Self. Hopefully we’re going to be doing a full book [on it], with Sally Kempton. It’s one of our core projects for the think tank, which we think evolves in a profound way the shadow conversation.
Let me hit four salient points.
One. When you look at the literature, it’s very unclear what shadow is. One way of telling the story is that shadow is anything that is unconscious, anything you can’t locate in your first person. That’s a legitimate and broad definition of shadow. In which case, the purpose of shadow work becomes to take that which is not in first person, you can’t find in your first person, bring it in, make it part of who you are. The integration of shadow is the clarion call of modern psychology in many of its forms. Integrate the shadow.
For example, Robert Bly’s little book on the shadow speaks of his desire as a young boy to kill his little brother’s desire to kill his brother. That desire is disowned. You don’t want to kill your brother. That’s a bad thing. It’s placed outside of self, and then it has effect. It drives, influences you in some way. You’re unaware of what is influencing you so you integrate it. You’re aware that you have that raw chimp primal desire to kill your brother inside of you.
The problem with that story is twofold. Why should you integrate it? Actually killing your brother is not a good idea. What is it you want to integrate? The simple answer is that there is energy in that desire.
How do you integrate that energy without integrating that desire? That’s unclear. A second answer that’s given is that you want to integrate the shadow because without integrating, it’s affecting you, driving you, moving you, and you become aware of it and you can have more control. Maybe. That might be true. There’s certainly some truth to it, but it’s extremely partial. What is this great grail quest to integrate shadow? Why would you want to integrate your pettiness, your anger, your rage, your deceitfulness? Is it better that you would integrate it as opposed to keeping it completely unconscious? I suppose so. But what’s the great glory of integration? Does it make it part of you? More conscious? More likely. But by making it more conscious, does it shift it? Somewhat. The whole shadow conversation is very murky, unclear. There’s a great call to integrate your shadow. But we’re not sure why, or how, or what it accomplishes.
In shadow work processes, for example: one famous process that comes from many sources is called the 3-2-1 of Shadow. Our friend and integral mentor, Ken Wilber, put it together based on other processes that were in the field: you see this shadow in third person , you have this third person view, then you dialogue with that person in second person, and then you locate this quality in first person. That’s definitely a good idea. You become aware of it. But it doesn’t seem to provide the efficacy or great benefit or salve or liberation or redemption that the great clarion call to shadow integration offers. So there’s this huge lack of clarity, huge ambiguity, about the nature of shadow and the nature of how shadow work operates and what its actual goals are. You see so many times, by the way, people do shadow work and then they keep playing out the shadow time and time gain. It doesn’t seem to have any real effect.
What I propose is a radical evolution of how we understand shadow and what the purpose of shadow work is, based on Unique Self. In essence, the move is as follows: we make a distinction between shadow and shadow qualities. Rage, pettiness, jealousy, violent impulse, etc., all of that, those are expressions of shadow qualities, not shadow. Shadow is actually something else. And we’ll talk about the relationship between shadow and shadow qualities…
Shadow at its core is your distorted Unique Self, your unlived Unique Self, your unlived story, your unlived Unique Self story is that which we call shadow. Your story is your Light. In Hebrew, it’s the same word as sapir, like Sapphire, blue light. In Siddha yoga which emerges out of Kashmir Shaivism, bright light is always an expression of self … but skipping the symbolism, your symbolism is unlived, part of it. That part which is in darkness is in shadow. That story seeking to live itself, seeking to have itself played out, seeking its own fulfillment, demands attention. It demands attention by acting out. That acting out is what causes the manifestation of shadow qualities (jealousy, rage, pettiness, violence, etc.). Shadow qualities are actually the expression of the desire of your story, which is now in darkness and shadow, to be able to come into the light and be lived.
In one sentence, that changes the game. Shadow is, at its core, Unique Self distortion… your unlived Unique Self. You don’t just have the shadow. You don’t have a generic shadow. Joe Perez’s shadow, Marc Gafni’s shadow, Ken Wilber’s shadow, Sally Kempton’s shadow, and Diane Hamilton’s shadow are all distinct, as distinct as our Unique Selves are… Unique Shadow carries the same core DNA quality, the same fingerprint as your Unique Self. You don’t have shadow. You have Unique Shadow. Just like you have a Unique Self, you have a Unique Shadow.
That then brings into play the next major idea… and with this we finish, at least we’ve traced the idea. Unique Shadow can bring you back to Unique Self. Actually, you can do not just 3-2-1, but 3-2-1-0-3: third person quality–what you see in someone else; you then talk to that quality in second person; then in first person, you locate it in yourself; then you locate the key quality and that’s Unique Shadow. People have Unique Shadow, the place where they always mess up, the place that’s always in the way which derails them in a fundamental way. Every single person listening right now knows what I mean. It’s that unique place where you mess up.
You’ve been dealing with it for years. It’s a distortion of your Unique Self, so paradoxically it can guide you back to your Unique Self. Shadow is the way back to the Unique Self.
Do I have another minute to get to the bottom of this?
Joe: Go ahead.
Marc: Here’s an example. I was working with someone in Switzerland a few years back who is a very fantastic educator. This person, a woman, who had been teaching at an elite private school for many years had this one strange quality. Every six or seven weeks, she would get into an arbitrary serious fight with someone else on the faculty or someone in her circle. When she wasn’t getting into one of these arbitrary fights, she was (and is) just the nicest, most gracious person in the world. And these fights were almost always about nothing. They were arbitrary.
So in doing a deep piece of work, at some point I asked her to be my teacher for three weeks. Being a teacher was important to her Unique Self. So for three weeks she taught me. We did a set of passages. She facilitated me comfortably. I felt held; [it was] beautifully done. But I realized that in three weeks she never once said anything definitive about what she felt about the text, what her understanding was. It was a profound holding, a teaching of the feminine … but lacked any masculine certainty of insemination. There was no masculine moving into me; there was no sharing with me her deep certainty, which I could then take into my system. There was a complete lack of the masculine thrust quality of teaching.
So what happened? Her Unique Self was teaching. She had put into shadow a huge dimension of her Unique Self: the masculine dimension of the teacher. The reason of course was that in this liberal Switzerland context, facilitative teaching was not only the norm but the ultimately valued and preferred way of teaching. But what happened was the kids weren’t getting what they needed from her. She had profound certainties about life which her students never felt, so her Unique Self was distorted.
How did it play out? She claimed false and arbitrary certainties every six or seven weeks in arbitrary arguments in which she would draw a line in the sand essentially over nothing . She was playing out her Unique Self quality in shadow form. Once she figured this out it was a massive a-ha. She had worked with this quality for years and years. Slowly, over a period of months, this shadow quality disappeared as she shifted her teaching style and integrated a powerful masculine, in balance with the feminine, and therefore healed and evolved her Unique Self of teaching. It wasn’t just shadow at play; it was Unique Shadow. The Unique Shadow was a distortion of Unique Self. Then she could follow that Unique Shadow back to herself.
Learn more about Unique Self and Shadow:
- See “Shadow Integration, An Excerpt from Your Unique Self” by Marc Gafni
- See Eros & Pseudo-Eros from Your Unique Self: The Radical Path to Personal Enlightenment by Marc Gafni (Integral Publishers, 2012)
Integral Psychology, Internal Family Systems, Imago Therapy, & Unique Self
Unique Self and the Internal Family Systems Model
Richard Schwartz & Marc Gafni
In this exciting dialogue from 2013, Dr. Gafni and Dr. Schwartz discuss the exciting potential integration of the Unique Self teaching into psychotherapy and especially the IFS Model.
Richard Schwartz is a leading expert in the field of psychotherapy and recognized as the founding developer of Internal Family Systems Theory, an influential therapeutical model which combines systems thinking with an integrative view of the mind and its discrete qualities.
Listen here:
For more audio dialogues on Integral Psychology, click here>>>
Mental Health in the Age of Violence – From Pushing Pills to Counseling Skills
Watch this TEDxCLE talk by Integral Psychologist and Associate Academic Director for CIW Dr. Elliott Ingersoll from 2013:
Elliott Ingersoll is a licensed psychologist and clinical counselor in Ohio. He is professor of counseling/counseling psychology and “Distinguished Faculty Member” at Cleveland State University. His research interests span a broad spectrum including psychopathology, mental health diagnosis, psychopharmacology, and spirituality in counseling and psychotherapy. He has authored or co-authored six books and dozens of peer-reviewed papers and book chapters on mental health related topics.
Elliott has been inspired and influenced by the Free Thought movement of the late 19th century and particularly by Robert Green Ingersoll, a leading freethinker of that time. He believes the most important skill for a human being is critical thinking seasoned with compassion. Elliott also is a singer/songwriter and creator of “FreeThought Folk Music” which he performs throughout Northeast Ohio. His CD “American Infidel” was released in 2013.
He has worked with Ken Wilber and the Integral Psychotherapy Team at Integral Institute since 2004 developing the Integral Psychotherapy approach. Integral Psychotherapy draws upon all validated psychotherapeutic approaches to help clients deal with psychological symptoms or live more fulfilling lives by removing barriers that come from living unconsciously. As an Integral Coach, he helps clients take action through motivation, methods of inquiry, and assisting clients in using the Integral Model to achieve their goals and improve their lives.
In the spirit of ideas worth spreading, TEDx is a program of local, self-organized events that bring people together to share a TED-like experience. At a TEDx event, TEDTalks video and live speakers combine to spark deep discussion and connection in a small group. These local, self-organized events are branded TEDx, where x = independently organized TED event. The TED Conference provides general guidance for the TEDx program, but individual TEDx events are self-organized.* (*Subject to certain rules and regulations)
Read Elliott’s Unique Self Psychology and the New Enlightenment Blog here>>>
Imago, Unique Self, & the Crying God
Harville Hendrix, Helen LaKelly Hunt, Lori Galperin, & Marc Gafni
Watch and listen to this gorgeous dialogue between four masters of their respective fields in the process of evolving the teaching of Unique Self, Unique We, Couplehood, Imago Therapy, and Unique Self Recovery.
Part 1 of the Dialogue:
For the whole dialogue, click here>>>
Harville Hendrix is a contemporary psychologist who co-founded Imago Relationship Therapy, along with his wife, Helen LaKelly Hunt. Harville Hendrix was born in 1935 in Statesboro, Georgia. He was an ordained Baptist minister before he completed his BA at Mercer University in Georgia, in 1957, and his BD from Union Theological Seminary in 1961. He went on to receive both an MA and PhD in psychology and religion from the Divinity School at the University of Chicago. Hendrix serves as a therapist, educator, and pastoral counselor. He has spent the last two decades practicing and teaching his own form of marriage and relationship therapy known as Imago Relationship Therapy in collaboration with his wife.
Helen LaKelly Hunt (born 1949) is a daughter of H. L. Hunt. She is founder and president of The Sister Fund, which describes itself as “a private women’s fund dedicated to the social, political, economic, and spiritual empowerment of women and girls.” She currently lives in New York with her husband, Harville Hendrix, a self-help author. Hunt was inducted into the National Women’s Hall of Fame, which cited her as a “[c]reative philanthropist who has used her own resources and others to create women’s funding institutions.”
Lori Galperin is a clinician, writer and teacher who began her 27 year career working in the area of sex & marital therapy. Training at Masters & Johnson Institute, she eventually became co-director, co-founded the first inpatient sexual trauma program in the country, and ultimately established and clinically co-directed three such programs. Her work spanned diverse populations including incest families, sex offenders, victims of sexual abuse and individuals struggling with sexual addiction.
Dr. Marc Gafni is a philosopher, public intellectual and wisdom teacher. He holds his doctorate in philosophy from Oxford University, rabbinic certification from the chief rabbinate in Israel, as well private rabbinic ordination. He is also ordained and holds a doctorate in religious science. He is the initiating thought leader, together with Ken Wilber, of World Spirituality based on Integral principles, as well as the leading theorist and teacher of Unique Self Enlightenment. He is the director of Center for Integral Wisdom (formerly World Spirituality), a think tank he co-founded in 2011 with Ken Wilber, Sally Kempton, and Mariana Caplan (now also joined by Lori Galperin) which is creating a body of work to evolve the source code of human existence.
The Evolutionary Emergent of Unique Self
Ken Wilber and Marc Gafni
In this exciting set of dialogues between the Center’s two co-founders, Ken Wilber and Marc Gafni, on the evolutionary emergent of Unique Self, like in Marc’s book, Your Unique Self, Marc and Ken ground Unique Self theory within the larger context of Integral Meta Theory.
For partial transcripts and some background information see this 8-part blog-series that featured the same dialogue.